What I know-vs-What
What I know...
Much of what
is contained within this project is considered "Scientific
Fact" while some is in fact just "what I know."
for me is a hazy line between what the latest science has been able
to theorize, and what I innately know to be true after my NDE experience.
Again, I don't understand the scientific equations involved, as
much as I simply understand which theories are true.
Like it or not...sorry,
that's just how this works. Faith/Reality/Intution...all similar
words in the vocabulary of my understanding of "what is."
When watching the plethora of current documentaries and science
series about Quantum Mechanics, Astro Physics, and related fields,
my poor wife has grown tired of me saying, "that's not right!"
or "they're getting close!" as if calling the plays at
a college football game. However, there is simply no way to explain
or repress my glee or disdain for things put forth as "fact"
by world-renowned scientists and physicists who often contradict
themselves from show to show.
Case in point:
hosting an ambiguous hour of a Science
Channel Show called "Curiosity: Is there a creator?"
In this hour,
Hawking does an admirable job of explaining the nuances of the Big
Bang (his favorite child) while weaving the concept of quantum mechanics
into his theory, as to how the first singularity could pop into
existence without a creator.
He states that
"you can't get to a time before the Big Bang, because there
was no BEFORE the Big Bang. We have finally found something that
doesn't have a cause, because there was no TIME for a cause to exist
in. For me, this means there is no possibility for a Creator, because
there is no time for a Creator to have existed."
Uhm...sorry Stephen,..in your own show...you disregarded a key fact
about quantum mechanics... if you are postulating that the original
singularity could have "popped into existence" just the
same way that we have observed sub-atomic particles doing so at
a quantum level, but then say that nothing could exist before time...you
are disproving your own theory about something outside of this space/time.
In quantum mechanics, particles have been observed to exist in more
than one place, and are now assumed to exist in more than one dimension
AT THE SAME TIME...
is a growing school of thought that this is a digital simulation,
that is merely here, as we percieve it, because our intentions and
beliefs demand that it collapse from probability into history. And
like it or not...THAT makes more sense than much of the "things
we don't know" in Quantum Science and basic evolutionary models.
It seems that
every religion, and now science, as its own religion, or anti-religion,
continues to limit the possibilities that are behind the true nature
of our universe and beyond.
It's what I
HOW do I know
What I know?
Maybe you should
ask "the big guy," "God," "the Infinite
Knowledge," "The Larger Consciousness System," "The
Creator," or whatever you choose to call the infinite intelligence
that permeates this universe and beyond. Because, as I explain,
the most clear and resounding effect in my NDE, was the vast knowledge
base of innate facts that coursed through my mind upon my return.
A mind, that I remind you, was bereft of any interest, much less
accumulated knowledge of science, physics, quantum mechanics and
more, prior to the experience.
So we are left
with two possibilities... Either I was granted a vast knowledge
of "what is" through my experience, or EVERYONE has this
innate knowledge buried deep within their physical mind and bodies,
and we just aren't aware of it. In either case...both facts would
be nothing short of miraculous.
And so...It just IS what it IS... love it or hate it.